Turn Standards

Half of the sites could not stand this test phase - right on them are only a few pages. Of the remaining four two sites consist of one or two simple pages that just hard to do something unconventional. And only two studio created a web site complete, standards-compliant. But we will continue our investigation. Choose a random portfolio of four studios (two of which, at its site posted the simplest pages), not seen in non-compliance with standards, a couple of works. Having checked the clients web sites on the validity of the studios, you can find the discrepancy to their standards. As a result, we can conclude - from hundreds of leading web studios Runet there is not one that follows the recommendations of W3C and adhere to standards when developing websites. Although these are studio set maximum prices for website development, resources for elementary follow the rules they have for some reason is not.

And whether you want to actually follow the standards? Of course, it is necessary. Recommendations invented not to complicate the life of developers, each requirement is intended to help make web pages better. For example, many developers do not like the description of images to add alternative text (alt attribute in tag img), that the validator is perceived as an error. Often, however, the user may be Turn off downloading of images or upload images had been broken link. In this case, the inscription on the spot in the drawings can be very helpful. In addition, the alternative text helps in search engine optimization. Wrong, developers should overcome the laziness and add text to each picture to the site was more convenient to use, and it was better optimized for search queries. Some developers may argue that the drawings without additional text they are used as design elements, and do not contain any useful information.