Energy-Saving Bulbs More and more disputes arise over the use of energy-saving light bulbs. The savings from replacing incandescent light bulbs with energy-saving fluorescent lamps are now probably no one in doubt. Recouped those costs in 2-3 years, while electricity consumption is reduced by 2 / 3 times. However, many scholars are critical of the desire of many countries to such savings. First, energy-efficient fluorescent This lamp contains mercury highly toxic. And although its amount is negligible - 4-5 mg and as such does not represent any danger. But one can only imagine what would happen if it divided the room. Mercury vapor, as we know since the school, are extremely dangerous. In this scenario, an urgent need to evacuate and ventilate the area well. Second, the cost of energy-saving fluorescent itself bulbs is much higher. A conducted studies show that their warranty period on the order of overstated manufacturers. Another important factor - bright white light. As it turned out, not everybody liked the bright, cold glow. Such light can cause headaches, epilepsy. People with sensitive skin - rash, edema, psoriasis. And this is a step towards such a disease, like skin cancer. Also proved negative effect on the eyes, through a special range of radiation. Especially dangerous are energy-saving fluorescent light bulbs for infants. Energy-saving lamps do not want to use in small rooms, in rooms with low ceilings, a wall-mounted fixtures. Remember, the more and more of human fluorescent lamps, the less harmful effects. And on a global ... Many developed countries are seeking in the near future to abandon conventional bulbs bulbs. There's an infrastructure for collection, removal and recycling of mercury-containing light bulbs obsolete their own. In our country do not even speak, but are actively promoting the use of mercury-containing lamps in order to economy. Just...
Metropolitan Area They are even admitted influences of pre-Columbian cultures to the culture of the conquerors. It also enter- and we are aware that more complex communication but we prefer the risk of reductionism, that the conquerors themselves had deep cracks between them. Of different types. And still in their updates. To the extent that much of the menu of alternatives to the pole for short call it G-8, are from the same countries that are trying to impose the pattern of globalizing homogenization was already explicit in the Charter of the United Nations, 1945. Thus, our daily life in our neighborhoods, our medium and small towns, our rural regions of Argentina, home to a cultural inertia of different layers, the latter of which has been increasingly hegemonic impulses of energy from hydrocarbons. We left because our monographic approach synergy generated by about 38 million people inhabiting the territory of Argentina. It is worth mentioning that following the recent national elections, was in readiness to vote 27 million people over 18 years. According to the 1991 census, there were 1600 settlements than 600 people, highlighting the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires, currently around 14 million people. In previous developments we put the emphasis on those around 1,440 settlements in the strip that is twenty thousand six hundred inhabitants. Also we conjecture, based on the schema shown in the splendor of the rail system by at least a thousand more human settlements, less than 600 inhabitants. They do not include the dispersed rural population.

Recent Comments