In our democracy, nor the mathematics is accurate. The criterion for which they are elect councilmen and members of the house of representatives in Brazil, simply ' ' consome' ' 60% of the votes and lead back to the power, frequently, incredible names. In the heading of this article the word ' ' Teorema' ' ' precedes with justice the term; ' anti-democracia' '. As much when it means ' ' affirmation that can be provada' ' , as when it wants to say ' ' espetculo' ' , in its origin Greek. For who it does not know the account, let us take as example a municipal lawsuit.

We go to imagine that an election had 10 a thousand valid votes for councilman and that it has 10 chairs in the City council. The number of valid votes is divided by the amount of chairs. Soon, we have a thousand (1000) votes for vacant, the call electoral quotient. In this in case that, a party that has made two a thousand votes chooses two councilmen, that is, two more voted of the party. As the numbers almost never they are accurate (as in the example) finish sobrando votes and chairs. The following process, known as rebuscagem, it distributes the remaining vacant between the leftovers of votes of the parties that have reached the electoral quotient. Following the cited hypothesis already, a party with 999 votes does not reach the quotient, then, exactly that these votes have been made for one alone candidate, them nothing they are valid in this account. Considering that few times in History, a candidate reached alone the electoral quotient (the 1000 votes or more) what we have here it is a great deceit.

Why? The addition of the votes of the elect ones rare arrives 40% of the total. The electoral equation is of tip-head. A spectacle that puts in them silly of the cut. In my sparing knowledge of the Mathematics, never vi count as this; in which ' ' menos' ' it has bigger weight. In the last election for the position of councilman of the city of So Paulo they had been considered valid, 6.005.928 votes. Of this total, 2.169.289 people had voted in one of the 55 paulistanos councilmen. Literally, the votes of 3,8 million remaining citizens had more not been considered. If it seems unreal light in that the equation discarded are at least 37 times more than the voting received for optimum placed from the electoral process. The general picture is thus: 44 councilmen had not arrived the 50 a thousand votes each. The individual percentage of these is inferior 1% of the total of voters of So Paulo. What it means that in this account does not have democracy; this without considering the factor rebuscagem. It joins to this, the fact of that many candidates (the candidates) the councilman is unaware of this equation. People that pass the life to the disposal of the parties and that, for better proposals that presents, hardly will occupy a chair in the parliament. Of ownership of research, he is very cheap to who knows the vile system if to choose for the purchase of votes. I do not affirm that this has happened in So Paulo, in this last election, but who can deny that the system is pernicious all> and until more interesting than the district vote, for example

We go to imagine that an election had 10 a thousand valid votes for councilman and that it has 10 chairs in the City council. The number of valid votes is divided by the amount of chairs. Soon, we have a thousand (1000) votes for vacant, the call electoral quotient. In this in case that, a party that has made two a thousand votes chooses two councilmen, that is, two more voted of the party. As the numbers almost never they are accurate (as in the example) finish sobrando votes and chairs. The following process, known as rebuscagem, it distributes the remaining vacant between the leftovers of votes of the parties that have reached the electoral quotient. Following the cited hypothesis already, a party with 999 votes does not reach the quotient, then, exactly that these votes have been made for one alone candidate, them nothing they are valid in this account. Considering that few times in History, a candidate reached alone the electoral quotient (the 1000 votes or more) what we have here it is a great deceit.

Why? The addition of the votes of the elect ones rare arrives 40% of the total. The electoral equation is of tip-head. A spectacle that puts in them silly of the cut. In my sparing knowledge of the Mathematics, never vi count as this; in which ' ' menos' ' it has bigger weight. In the last election for the position of councilman of the city of So Paulo they had been considered valid, 6.005.928 votes. Of this total, 2.169.289 people had voted in one of the 55 paulistanos councilmen. Literally, the votes of 3,8 million remaining citizens had more not been considered. If it seems unreal light in that the equation discarded are at least 37 times more than the voting received for optimum placed from the electoral process. The general picture is thus: 44 councilmen had not arrived the 50 a thousand votes each. The individual percentage of these is inferior 1% of the total of voters of So Paulo. What it means that in this account does not have democracy; this without considering the factor rebuscagem. It joins to this, the fact of that many candidates (the candidates) the councilman is unaware of this equation. People that pass the life to the disposal of the parties and that, for better proposals that presents, hardly will occupy a chair in the parliament. Of ownership of research, he is very cheap to who knows the vile system if to choose for the purchase of votes. I do not affirm that this has happened in So Paulo, in this last election, but who can deny that the system is pernicious all> and until more interesting than the district vote, for example

## Recent Comments

Account Deleted:nice water treatment systems! thanks! http://... | more »Jen McCleve:Interesting post, Ive never thought of everythi... | more »